中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 379-390.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7006 379
卞金龙1, 蒋玉兰1, 刘艳阳1, 冯咏芳2, 刘贺1, 夏仕明1, 刘立军1,*()
收稿日期:
2017-01-10
修回日期:
2017-03-29
出版日期:
2017-07-25
发布日期:
2017-07-10
通讯作者:
刘立军
基金资助:
Jinlong BIAN1, Yulan JIANG1, Yanyang LIU1, Yongfang FENG2, He LIU1, Shiming XIA1, Lijun LIU1,*()
Received:
2017-01-10
Revised:
2017-03-29
Online:
2017-07-25
Published:
2017-07-10
Contact:
Lijun LIU
摘要:
目的旨在阐明全生育期干湿交替灌溉对抗旱性不同水稻品种产量的影响。方法以抗旱性差异显著的4个水稻品种(籼稻扬稻6号和两优培九,粳稻旱优8号和镇稻88)为材料,以常规水层灌溉(CI)为对照,在盆栽条件下研究了轻干湿交替灌溉(WMD)和重干湿交替灌溉(WSD)对水稻产量、根系、叶片及籽粒部分生理特性的影响。结果与CI相比,WMD处理下抗旱性较强品种扬稻6号和旱优8号产量分别提高6.90%和7.45%,抗旱性较弱品种两优培九和镇稻88产量分别降低7.28%和8.10%。WSD处理下,4个水稻品种的产量均显著下降,抗旱性较弱的品种产量降幅远高于抗旱性较强的水稻品种。WMD处理下,扬稻6号和旱优8号复水后根系氧化力、根系与叶片细胞分裂素(玉米素+玉米素核苷)含量、叶片光合速率和籽粒中蔗糖-淀粉代谢途径关键酶的活性均较CI有不同程度提高,而两优培九和镇稻88上述指标则与CI持平或有不同程度降低。WSD处理下,4个品种上述指标均较CI不同程度降低。结论轻干湿交替灌溉条件下,根系活性强、叶片细胞分裂素含量和光合速率高、籽粒中蔗糖-淀粉代谢途径关键酶活性强是抗旱性较强水稻品种的基本生理特征。
卞金龙, 蒋玉兰, 刘艳阳, 冯咏芳, 刘贺, 夏仕明, 刘立军. 干湿交替灌溉对抗旱性不同水稻品种产量的影响及其生理原因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 379-390.
Jinlong BIAN, Yulan JIANG, Yanyang LIU, Yongfang FENG, He LIU, Shiming XIA, Lijun LIU. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation on Grain Yield in Rice Cultivars with Different Drought Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(4): 379-390.
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 每盒穗数 Panicle number per pot | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weigh/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
扬稻6号 | CI | 23±2 a | 168±5 b | 86.6±0.9 b | 28.1±0.4 b |
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 21±1 ab | 181±4 a | 92.7±0.7 a | 28.8±0.3 ab |
WSD | 18±2 b | 179±5 a | 88.2±0.8 b | 29.1±0.2 a | |
两优培九 | CI | 25±2 a | 185±4 b | 85.1±0.6 b | 26.4±0.3 c |
Liangyoupeijiu | WMD | 21±1 b | 206±5 a | 87.2±0.9 a | 27.1±0.2 b |
WSD | 18±1 c | 207±3 a | 83.8±0.6 c | 27.7±0.2 a | |
旱优8号 | CI | 25±1 a | 164±6 b | 88.5±0.7 a | 25.8±0.6 c |
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 25±2 ab | 173±2 a | 88.5±0.8 a | 26.8±0.3 a |
WSD | 22±1 b | 177±4 a | 87.8±0.8 a | 26.9±0.4 a | |
镇稻88 | CI | 28±2 a | 142±4 b | 93.5±0.9 a | 27.2±0.5 b |
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 24±1 b | 155±6 a | 89.9±0.7 b | 28.3±0.4 a |
WSD | 21±1 c | 158±3 a | 85.8±0.8 c | 27.1±0.4 b |
表1 干湿交替灌溉对抗旱性不同水稻品种产量构成因素的影响
Table 1 Effect of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield components of rice cultivars with different drought resistance
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 每盒穗数 Panicle number per pot | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weigh/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
扬稻6号 | CI | 23±2 a | 168±5 b | 86.6±0.9 b | 28.1±0.4 b |
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 21±1 ab | 181±4 a | 92.7±0.7 a | 28.8±0.3 ab |
WSD | 18±2 b | 179±5 a | 88.2±0.8 b | 29.1±0.2 a | |
两优培九 | CI | 25±2 a | 185±4 b | 85.1±0.6 b | 26.4±0.3 c |
Liangyoupeijiu | WMD | 21±1 b | 206±5 a | 87.2±0.9 a | 27.1±0.2 b |
WSD | 18±1 c | 207±3 a | 83.8±0.6 c | 27.7±0.2 a | |
旱优8号 | CI | 25±1 a | 164±6 b | 88.5±0.7 a | 25.8±0.6 c |
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 25±2 ab | 173±2 a | 88.5±0.8 a | 26.8±0.3 a |
WSD | 22±1 b | 177±4 a | 87.8±0.8 a | 26.9±0.4 a | |
镇稻88 | CI | 28±2 a | 142±4 b | 93.5±0.9 a | 27.2±0.5 b |
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 24±1 b | 155±6 a | 89.9±0.7 b | 28.3±0.4 a |
WSD | 21±1 c | 158±3 a | 85.8±0.8 c | 27.1±0.4 b |
图3 干湿交替灌溉下不同水稻品种根系玉米素+玉米素核苷(Z+ZR)含量的变化(复水后测定结果)
Fig. 3. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on zeatin (Z) + zeatin riboside (ZR) content in roots
图5 根系Z+ZR含量与根系氧化力和叶片光合速率、Z+ZR含量的相关(n=48)
Fig. 5. Correlation coefficients of Z+ZR in roots and root oxidation activity with Z+ZR in leaves and photosynthetic rate.
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 分蘖中期 Mid-tillering stage | 穗分化期 Panicle initiation | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | |||||
扬稻6号 | CI | 17.1±0.9 a | 17.3±0.8 b | 16.9±0.8 a | 17.2±0.9 b | 19.1±0.9 a | 19.6±0.8 b | 10.3±0.6 a | 10.1±0.9 b | |||
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 16.9±0.8 a | 20.2±0.8 a | 15.9±1.1 a | 19.8±1.2 a | 18.6±1.1 a | 22.1±1.1 a | 9.6±0.8 a | 13.9±0.7 a | |||
WSD | 10.1±1.3 c | 14.1±1.2 c | 10.9±1.3 c | 14.7±1.3 c | 12.9±0.9 c | 16.9±0.8 c | 5.9±0.4 c | 8.9±0.6 c | ||||
两优培九 | CI | 17.8±1.2 a | 18.1±0.4 a | 17.7±0.4 a | 18.1±0.4 a | 22.1±1.1 a | 22.9±1.3 a | 14.3±0.7 a | 14.9±0.5 a | |||
Liangyoupeiju | WMD | 15.2±0.9 b | 17.9±0.6 a | 17.1±0.7 a | 17.8±0.5 a | 19.6±0.7 b | 20.3±1.1 b | 12.0±0.9 b | 14.6±0.8 a | |||
WSD | 12.5±0.6 c | 15.4±0.3 b | 12.9±0.5 c | 15.4±0.4 b | 13.4±0.4 c | 16.2±0.9 c | 5.6±0.3 c | 7.9±0.3 b | ||||
旱优8号 | CI | 18.1±0.9 a | 18.4±0.8 b | 18.0±0.7 a | 19.0±0.5 b | 19.2±0.5 a | 20.8±0.9 b | 11.7±0.3 a | 11.8±0.5 b | |||
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 16.9±0.9 a | 20.8±1.1 a | 17.2±0.8 a | 20.6±0.6 a | 19.1±0.5 a | 23.1±1.1 a | 11.4±0.4 a | 14.9±0.5 a | |||
WSD | 11.4±0.4 c | 15.9±0.6 c | 11.9±0.4 c | 15.8±0.5 c | 12.7±0.6 b | 17.2±0.6 c | 6.2±0.2 c | 9.9±0.3 c | ||||
镇稻88 | CI | 18.1±0.7 a | 18.3±0.7 a | 17.9±0.6 a | 18.3±0.7 a | 19.9±0.7 a | 20.3±0.9 a | 11.7±0.6 a | 11.8±0.5 a | |||
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 15.9±0.6 b | 17.9±0.6 a | 16.2±0.4 b | 18.2±0.6 a | 19.2±0.8 a | 21.1±0.8 a | 10.4±0.6 b | 11.9±0.5 a | |||
WSD | 11.4±0.4 c | 15.8±0.4 b | 11.8±0.5 c | 15.8±0.4 b | 12.2±0.5 b | 16.9±0.6 b | 6.4±0.3 c | 9.2±0.4 b |
表2 干湿交替灌溉下抗旱性不同水稻品种光合速率的变化
Table 2 Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on photosynthetic rate. µmol/(m2·s)
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 分蘖中期 Mid-tillering stage | 穗分化期 Panicle initiation | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | |||||
扬稻6号 | CI | 17.1±0.9 a | 17.3±0.8 b | 16.9±0.8 a | 17.2±0.9 b | 19.1±0.9 a | 19.6±0.8 b | 10.3±0.6 a | 10.1±0.9 b | |||
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 16.9±0.8 a | 20.2±0.8 a | 15.9±1.1 a | 19.8±1.2 a | 18.6±1.1 a | 22.1±1.1 a | 9.6±0.8 a | 13.9±0.7 a | |||
WSD | 10.1±1.3 c | 14.1±1.2 c | 10.9±1.3 c | 14.7±1.3 c | 12.9±0.9 c | 16.9±0.8 c | 5.9±0.4 c | 8.9±0.6 c | ||||
两优培九 | CI | 17.8±1.2 a | 18.1±0.4 a | 17.7±0.4 a | 18.1±0.4 a | 22.1±1.1 a | 22.9±1.3 a | 14.3±0.7 a | 14.9±0.5 a | |||
Liangyoupeiju | WMD | 15.2±0.9 b | 17.9±0.6 a | 17.1±0.7 a | 17.8±0.5 a | 19.6±0.7 b | 20.3±1.1 b | 12.0±0.9 b | 14.6±0.8 a | |||
WSD | 12.5±0.6 c | 15.4±0.3 b | 12.9±0.5 c | 15.4±0.4 b | 13.4±0.4 c | 16.2±0.9 c | 5.6±0.3 c | 7.9±0.3 b | ||||
旱优8号 | CI | 18.1±0.9 a | 18.4±0.8 b | 18.0±0.7 a | 19.0±0.5 b | 19.2±0.5 a | 20.8±0.9 b | 11.7±0.3 a | 11.8±0.5 b | |||
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 16.9±0.9 a | 20.8±1.1 a | 17.2±0.8 a | 20.6±0.6 a | 19.1±0.5 a | 23.1±1.1 a | 11.4±0.4 a | 14.9±0.5 a | |||
WSD | 11.4±0.4 c | 15.9±0.6 c | 11.9±0.4 c | 15.8±0.5 c | 12.7±0.6 b | 17.2±0.6 c | 6.2±0.2 c | 9.9±0.3 c | ||||
镇稻88 | CI | 18.1±0.7 a | 18.3±0.7 a | 17.9±0.6 a | 18.3±0.7 a | 19.9±0.7 a | 20.3±0.9 a | 11.7±0.6 a | 11.8±0.5 a | |||
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 15.9±0.6 b | 17.9±0.6 a | 16.2±0.4 b | 18.2±0.6 a | 19.2±0.8 a | 21.1±0.8 a | 10.4±0.6 b | 11.9±0.5 a | |||
WSD | 11.4±0.4 c | 15.8±0.4 b | 11.8±0.5 c | 15.8±0.4 b | 12.2±0.5 b | 16.9±0.6 b | 6.4±0.3 c | 9.2±0.4 b |
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 分蘖中期 Mid-tillering | 穗分化期 Panicle initiation | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | |||||
扬稻6号 | CI | 43.2±2.3 a | 45.6±2.9 b | 89.0±3.1 b | 87.3±4.4 b | 83.0±3.2 b | 89.1±2.9 b | 28.6±1.9 b | 31.1±1.9 b | |||
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 29.1±2.5 b | 52.1±3.2 a | 103.3±4.2 a | 118.4±4.2 a | 97.4±3.3 a | 112.2±3.6 a | 51.3±2.6 a | 64.5±2.2 a | |||
WSD | 21.3±2.8 c | 32.3±2.4 c | 70.3±5.2 c | 83.2±4.3 c | 81.3±3.1 c | 89.0±3.1 b | 18.2±1.9 c | 37.9±2.1 c | ||||
两优培九 | CI | 45.0±3.1 a | 47.7±3.3 a | 88.9±4.2 a | 90.1±3.8 a | 83.6±2.9 b | 86.3±3.3 b | 27.2±1.8 b | 31.5±2.1 b | |||
Liangyoupeijiu | WMD | 31.6±2.2 b | 42.1±2.9 b | 81.1±4.9 b | 91.4±3.7 a | 91.3±3.3 a | 103.3±3.9 a | 47.1±2.1 a | 61.2±1.9 a | |||
WSD | 22.7±2.5 c | 29.3±2.8 c | 67.2±3.7 c | 77.6±3.6 c | 75.5±3.6 c | 84.3±2.8 c | 19.3±1.6 c | 29.1±2.3 b | ||||
旱优8号 | CI | 41.1±3.2 a | 44.3±2.9 b | 75.1±3.5 b | 82.5±3.3 b | 67.2±3.7 b | 70.4±3.1 b | 36.1±2.1 b | 40.1±2.2 b | |||
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 30.0±2.7 b | 50.8±2.2 a | 95.7±3.7 a | 107.3±4.1 a | 90.4±4.5 a | 99.1±4.2 a | 52.5±2.7 a | 63.3±1.8 a | |||
WSD | 20.5±3.2 c | 35.6±3.1 c | 61.8±3.4 c | 72.6±2.4 c | 50.3±3.6 c | 70.8±3.2 b | 20.4±2.6 c | 28.3±1.3 c | ||||
镇稻88 | CI | 41.4±2.7 a | 44.2±2.8 a | 76.3±3.1 b | 78.8±2.7 b | 70.3±3.8 b | 71.3±3.5 b | 34.7±2.2 b | 36.1±1.5 b | |||
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 29.3±3.5 b | 39.3±3.2 b | 80.4±3.7 a | 93.1±4.1 a | 86.4±3.8 a | 94.0±2.9 a | 53.1±3.2 a | 59.3±1.6 a | |||
WSD | 21.2±2.9 c | 29.5±1.9 c | 56.2±3.7 c | 69.4±3.9 c | 51.7±3.9 c | 68.2±2.9 c | 19.6±1.9 c | 29.4±1.1 c |
表3 干湿交替灌溉下不同水稻品种叶片Z+ZR含量的变化
Table 3 Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on Z+ZR in leaves. pmol/g
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 分蘖中期 Mid-tillering | 穗分化期 Panicle initiation | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | W1 | W2 | |||||
扬稻6号 | CI | 43.2±2.3 a | 45.6±2.9 b | 89.0±3.1 b | 87.3±4.4 b | 83.0±3.2 b | 89.1±2.9 b | 28.6±1.9 b | 31.1±1.9 b | |||
Yangdao 6 | WMD | 29.1±2.5 b | 52.1±3.2 a | 103.3±4.2 a | 118.4±4.2 a | 97.4±3.3 a | 112.2±3.6 a | 51.3±2.6 a | 64.5±2.2 a | |||
WSD | 21.3±2.8 c | 32.3±2.4 c | 70.3±5.2 c | 83.2±4.3 c | 81.3±3.1 c | 89.0±3.1 b | 18.2±1.9 c | 37.9±2.1 c | ||||
两优培九 | CI | 45.0±3.1 a | 47.7±3.3 a | 88.9±4.2 a | 90.1±3.8 a | 83.6±2.9 b | 86.3±3.3 b | 27.2±1.8 b | 31.5±2.1 b | |||
Liangyoupeijiu | WMD | 31.6±2.2 b | 42.1±2.9 b | 81.1±4.9 b | 91.4±3.7 a | 91.3±3.3 a | 103.3±3.9 a | 47.1±2.1 a | 61.2±1.9 a | |||
WSD | 22.7±2.5 c | 29.3±2.8 c | 67.2±3.7 c | 77.6±3.6 c | 75.5±3.6 c | 84.3±2.8 c | 19.3±1.6 c | 29.1±2.3 b | ||||
旱优8号 | CI | 41.1±3.2 a | 44.3±2.9 b | 75.1±3.5 b | 82.5±3.3 b | 67.2±3.7 b | 70.4±3.1 b | 36.1±2.1 b | 40.1±2.2 b | |||
Hanyou 8 | WMD | 30.0±2.7 b | 50.8±2.2 a | 95.7±3.7 a | 107.3±4.1 a | 90.4±4.5 a | 99.1±4.2 a | 52.5±2.7 a | 63.3±1.8 a | |||
WSD | 20.5±3.2 c | 35.6±3.1 c | 61.8±3.4 c | 72.6±2.4 c | 50.3±3.6 c | 70.8±3.2 b | 20.4±2.6 c | 28.3±1.3 c | ||||
镇稻88 | CI | 41.4±2.7 a | 44.2±2.8 a | 76.3±3.1 b | 78.8±2.7 b | 70.3±3.8 b | 71.3±3.5 b | 34.7±2.2 b | 36.1±1.5 b | |||
Zhendao 88 | WMD | 29.3±3.5 b | 39.3±3.2 b | 80.4±3.7 a | 93.1±4.1 a | 86.4±3.8 a | 94.0±2.9 a | 53.1±3.2 a | 59.3±1.6 a | |||
WSD | 21.2±2.9 c | 29.5±1.9 c | 56.2±3.7 c | 69.4±3.9 c | 51.7±3.9 c | 68.2±2.9 c | 19.6±1.9 c | 29.4±1.1 c |
图6 干湿交替灌溉对不同水稻品种籽粒中蔗糖合酶(SuSase)活性的影响
Fig. 6. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on the activities of sucrose synthase (SuSase) in grains.
图7 干湿交替灌溉对不同水稻品种籽粒中淀粉分支酶(SBEase)活性的影响
Fig. 7. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on the activities of starch branching enzyme (SBEase) in grains.
图8 干湿交替灌溉对不同水稻品种籽粒中腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)活性的影响
Fig. 8. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on the activities of adenosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) in grains.
图9 干湿交替灌溉对不同水稻品种籽粒中淀粉合酶(StSase)活性的影响
Fig. 9. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on the activities of Starch synthase (StSase) in grains.
[1] | 杨文钰, 屠乃美.作物栽培学各论. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2003, 2: 5-8. |
Yang W Y, Tu N M. Crop Cultivation Theory.Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2003, 2: 5-8. | |
[2] | 中华人民共和国水利部.2006年中国水资源公报. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2007. |
The Ministry of Water Resources. China Water Resources Bulletin. Beijing: China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, 2007. | |
[3] | 张伟义. 大力推广“薄、浅、湿润、晒”灌溉新技术促使农业再上新台阶.上海水利, 1998, s2: 37-39. |
Zhang W Y.Vigorously promote the “thin、shallow、moist、sun” irrigation technology to promote agriculture to a new level.Shanghai Water, 1998, s2: 37-39. | |
[4] | 吴端普, 吴天恩, 吴亚雄. 水稻需水规律与灌溉技术试验研究.农田水利与小水电, 1995, 11: 11-13. |
Wu D P, Wu T E, Wu Y X.Study on rice water requirement and irrigation technique.China Rural Water Hydrop, 1995, 11: 11-13. | |
[5] | 李远华, 张祖莲, 赵长友,薛继亮,余峰,赛力克·加甫. 水稻间歇灌溉的节水增产机理研究. 中国农村水利水电, 1998, 11:12-15. |
Li Y H, Zhang Z L, Zhao C Y, Xue J L, Yu F, Sailike J.Study on water saving and yield increasing mechanism of rice intermittent irrigation.China Rural Water Hydrop, 1998, 11: 12-15. | |
[6] | 张恩江, 韩雪冰, 刘春河. 寒区水稻节水控制灌溉技术应用研究. 黑龙江水专学报, 2007, 34(2): 11-13. |
Zhang E J, Han X B, Liu C H.Water saving control irrigation technique of rice in cold regions of Heilongjiang province.J Heilongjiang Hydraul Engin Coll, 2007, 34(2): 11-13. | |
[7] | 周立奎, 焦艳. 对水稻控制灌溉技术应用的研究. 中国科技信息, 2007, 12: 63-64. |
Zhou L K, Jiao Y.Study on application of controlled irrigation technique of rice.China Sci Technol Infor, 2007, 12: 63-64. | |
[8] | Toung TP, Bouman BAM, Mortimer M.More rice, less water-integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia.Plant Prod Sci, 2005, 8: 231-241. |
[9] | Won J G, Choi J S, Lee S P, Son S H, Chung S O.Water saving by shallow intermittent irrigation and growth of rice.Plant Prod Sci, 2005, 8: 487-492. |
[10] | Yang C, Yang L, Yang Y, Ouyang Z.Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils.Agric Water Manag, 2004, 70: 67-81. |
[11] | Kukal S S, Aggarwal G C.Pudding depth and intensity effects in rice-wheat system on a sandy loam soil, II Water use and crop performance.Soil Till Res, 2003, 74: 37-45. |
[12] | Bouman BAM, Fen Lg, Tuong TP, Lu L, Wang H, Feng Y.Exploring options to grow rice using less water in nitrogen China using a modeling approach: II. Quantifying yield, water balance components, and water productivity.Agric Water Manag, 2007, 88: 23-33. |
[13] | Mishra H S, Rathore T R, Pant R C.Effect of intermittent irrigation on groundwater table contribution, irrigation requirement and yield of rice in Mullions of Tarai region.Agric Water Manag,1990, 18: 231-241. |
[14] | Tabbal D F,Bouman B A M, Bhuiyan S I, Sibayan E B, Sattar MA. On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice: case studies in the Philippines.Agric Water Manag, 2002,56: 93-112. |
[15] | 陈新红, 徐国伟, 孙华山,王志琴,杨建昌. 结实期土壤水分与氮素营养对水稻产量与品质的影响. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2003, 24(3): 37-41. |
Chen X H, Xu G W, Sun H S, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Effects of soil moisture and nitrogen nutrition during grain filling on the grain yield and quality of rice. J Yangzhou Univ: Agric Life Sci Ed, 2003, 24(3): 37-41. | |
[16] | 胡继超, 姜东, 曹卫星,罗卫红. 短期干旱对水稻叶水势、光合作用及干物质分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(1): 63-67. |
Hu J C, Jiang D, Cao W X, Luo W H.Effect of short-term drought on leaf water potential photosynthesis and dry matter partitioning in paddy rice.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15(1): 63-67. | |
[17] | 章骏德, 刘国屏, 施永宁. 植物生理实验法. 南昌:江西人民出版社, 1982, 52-57. |
Zhang J D, Liu G P, Shi Y N.Experimental plant physiology. Nanchang: Jiangxi People’s Publishing House, 1981, 153: 561-571 | |
[18] | 陈远平, 杨文钰. 卵叶韭休眠芽中GA3、IAA、ABA和ZT的高效液相色谱法测定. 四川农业大学学报, 2005, 23(4): 60-68. |
Chen Y P, Yang W Y.Determination of GA3, IAA, ABA, and ZT in dormant buds of allium ovalifolium by HPLC.J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2005, 23(4): 60-68. | |
[19] | Weiler E W, Jordan P S, Conrad W.Levels of indole-3-acetic acid in intact and decapitated as determined by a specific and highly sensitive solid-phase enzyme immay.Planta, 1981, 153: 561-571. |
[20] | Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Liu L J.Activities of enzymes involved in sucrose-to-starch metabolism in rice grains subjected to water stress during filling.Field Crops Res, 2003, 81: 69-81. |
[21] | Yang J C, Zhang J H, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S.Carbon remobilization and grain filling in japonica/indica hybrid rice subjected to postanthesis water deficits.Agron J, 2002, 94: 102-109. |
[22] | Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Zhu Q S.Postanthesis water deficits enhance grain filling in two-line hybrid rice.Crop Sci, 2003, 43(6): 2099-2108. |
[23] | Belder P, Bouman B A M,Cabangon R, Guoan L, Quilang E J P,Li Y, Spiertz J H J, Tuong T P.Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia.Agric Water Manag, 2004, 65: 193-210. |
[24] | Ramasamy S, Berge H, Purushothaman S.Yield formation in rice in response to drainage and nitrogen application.Field Crops Res, 1997, 51: 65-82. |
[25] | Chu G, Chen T, Wang Z, Yang,J,Zhang J. Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice.Field Crops Res, 2014, 162: 108-119. |
[26] | Li H, Liu L, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.Agronomic and physiological performance of high-yielding wheat and rice in the lower reaches of Yangtze River of China.Field Crops Res, 2012, 133: 119-129. |
[27] | Yao F, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L, Xiang J, Liu X, Wu W, Chen M, Peng S.Agronomic performance of high-yielding rice variety grown under alternate wetting an drying irrigation.Field Crops Res, 2012, 126: 16-22. |
[28] | Stoop W A, Uphoff N, Kassam A.A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming system for resource-poor farmers.Agric Sys, 2002, 71: 249-274. |
[29] | Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Wang W.Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling.Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 315-323. |
[30] | Wopereis M C S, Kropff M J, Maligaya A R, Tuong T P. Drought-stress responses of two lowland rice cultivars to soil water status.Field Crops Res, 1996, 46: 21-39. |
[31] | Lu J, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T.The effects of irrigation regimes on the water use, dry matter production and physiological responses of paddy rice.Plant Soil, 2000, 223: 207-216. |
[32] | Cheng C Y,Lur H S.Ethylene may be involved in abortion of the maize caryopsis.Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 245-252. |
[33] | Apelbaum A, Yang SF.Biosynthesis of stress-ethylene induced by water deficit.Plant Physiol, 1981, 68: 594-596. |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[9] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[10] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[11] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[12] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||